Brand & storytelling · 7 min read
How does media connect with people?
Reach is cheap. Connection is rare. A working theory of why some campaigns stop the scroll and others get muted — written from inside a school marketing team.
By Jack Frampton · Published 25 May 2026
Every brand has access to the same platforms. The same ad inventory, the same algorithms, the same stock libraries, the same Canva templates. So why does one piece of media get screenshotted and sent to a group chat, and another — with twice the spend behind it — get scrolled past in under a second?
I've thought about this a lot in the last 18 months running social and content for Queen's College Taunton. Here's the working theory.
Connection is a recognition reflex
Media doesn't create a feeling in someone — it gives them permission to recognise a feeling they already had. "Yes, that's exactly what it's like." "Yes, that's what I've been trying to explain to my partner." "Yes, that's why I switched." The brain doesn't reward information; it rewards articulation.
This is why the same product, sold by two brands with the same features, can have a 10x difference in word-of-mouth. The winning brand isn't better. It's better at saying out loud what the customer was already thinking.
Specificity beats universality
The instinct when you brief a campaign is to write copy that "applies to everyone". This is the biggest mistake in marketing media. The more specific you go — a real place, a real Tuesday, a real overheard sentence — the more people see themselves in it. Universality flattens the edges that create recognition.
One of our best-performing pieces at Queen's was a 14-second video of a Year 9 cellist tuning up in an empty hall before a concert. It wasn't "about" the school. It was about that ten seconds of nerves every musician knows. Parents shared it because it was the inside of their kid's head.
Cost is what makes a story land
Marketing case studies almost always describe the resolution and skip the cost. "We grew revenue 350% in six months." Cool. What did it cost? What did the founder give up? What broke along the way? Without the cost the story has no weight, because the brain doesn't believe a resolution that arrived easily.
This is why testimonials with a real before-state ("I'd given up on running campaigns at all after we lost £4k on the last one") always outperform testimonials that just praise the after. The cost gives the praise something to push against.
The four things that move people
Almost every piece of media that connects does one of four things. Most do two:
- Names a feeling the audience couldn't quite name themselves.
- Picks a side in a debate the audience already cared about.
- Shows the work behind something the audience assumed was easy.
- Gives them a status move — something they can share that signals who they are.
If a campaign you've planned doesn't do at least one of these, it'll get reach but not connection. Reach without connection is just paid awareness — and awareness, on its own, doesn't convert.
How to measure it
Likes and reach are vanity. The metrics that actually track connection:
- Save rate — people only save things they want to come back to.
- Share rate — sharing is a social risk; people only do it when the media represents them well.
- Comment depth — not how many, but how long. Two paragraph comments mean the piece hit a nerve.
- Branded search lift — the cleanest lagging indicator. If the week after a campaign your branded Google searches jump, the media connected.
The boring truth
Most media that connects isn't expensive. It's just specific, honest, and willing to leave the cost in. Brands underspend on writing and overspend on production. A £200 voiceover by someone who actually thought about the words will outperform a £20,000 shoot with generic copy nearly every time.
From the LinkedIn post
This article expands on a short LinkedIn post I wrote on the same question. Read the original (and the replies) on LinkedIn. There's also a related post on being a marketing apprentice in Taunton that picks up the same thread.
Frequently asked questions
- Why do most marketing campaigns fail to connect?
- Because they're built around what the brand wants to say rather than what the audience already feels. Connection is a recognition reflex — people share content that articulates something they already half-believed. Campaigns that lead with a product feature or a discount almost never trigger that reflex.
- What's the difference between reach and connection in marketing?
- Reach is how many people see your media. Connection is how many people feel something they want to act on. Reach is cheap and getting cheaper — every platform will sell you impressions. Connection is rare and compounds: one piece of media that genuinely lands buys you years of word-of-mouth.
- How do you measure emotional connection in a campaign?
- Save rate, share rate, comment depth, and unsolicited DMs beat likes and reach. Branded search lift (how many more people Google your name in the week after the campaign) is the single best lagging indicator. Survey-based brand-recall studies work for bigger budgets.
- Can a small business or school create media that genuinely connects?
- Yes — often better than big brands can. Smaller teams can be specific. They can name a real place, a real person, a real Tuesday. Specificity is what creates recognition, and recognition is what creates connection. Big brands water that out trying to be universal.
- What's the role of storytelling in marketing media?
- Story is the format brains are wired to remember. A character we recognise, a tension we feel, a resolution that costs them something. Most marketing skips the cost. The cost is what makes the resolution mean anything — that's why testimonials with a before-state always outperform testimonials that just describe the after.